• Creation and production are identified as having the greatest structural frailty and offer the clearest opportunities for targeted investment and capacity development.

  • The industry is heavily skewed geographically. 41% of all mapped physical music infrastructure is concentrated solely in Knox County, leaving peripheral counties without the critical mass needed to sustain local musical economies.

  • There is a lack of businesses supporting the music sector, and existing managers/booking agents and record labels received the lowest ratings by musicians in terms of relevance, quality and availability, with over half of musicians reporting no engagement with them. 

  • Peripheral counties often center around a few subcategories, which can lead to the development of narrow local identities and music‑related offerings, underscoring a need for regional coordination.

  • The overall ecosystem operates below national concentration levels, with an establishment LQ of 0.89 and an employment LQ of 0.73, indicating considerable space for growth.

    • Creation activities have one of the lowest concentrations (employment LQ of 0.21), representing a limited presence of artists and composers.

    • Production shows similarly low specialization (employment LQ of 0.07), highlighting a very narrow local base of recording and production services.

    • While Distribution's establishment LQ exceeds 1.0, the employment LQ (0.58) and the employment LQs for Exhibition (0.51) and Transversal (0.76) are still below the national level of concentration.

  • Assets are heavily concentrated in Exhibition (53%) and Transversal (28%), while Production (8%) and Distribution (11%) functions, which typically support commercial growth, remain limited.

Previous
Previous

Export & Music Circulation

Next
Next

Financial Resources